We live in a paradox. There are few words for us, our vocabulary is limited as much as it gives us the sensation that our possibilities for thought are infinite. And so, at the same time they define, they enslave us. The language sets the borders for the relationship variables, giving every feeling, image, speech or action an exact place in the complex communicational system we move upon. The paradox lies not only in this definitorial relationship, but in our strange assurance of believing we invent for the first time each one of our movements and senses, when deep down it is only language, which precedes us. And it is at this point that the art of our days is presented as revolutionary, because it turns things visible as it moves them from the standards of visibility given by that system, which is to say, it exposes us to the invention it represents and its mechanism of communication.
This is why, when we see a contemporary work of art, one of the questions that may arise relates to what that visible thing is, that hidden in its everyday name, we no longer see as a construction, and how and under which artistic excuse it is mobilized for it to name and question our linguistic relationships under some visual combination.
The works presented by Claudio Romo are framed within this line of mobilization. His pieces expose cultural codes under the body's structure. The body displays the social need of inscribing oneself under cultural codes in order to be percieved with validity. By exposing the human body in the codes of deformity, laceration and mutilation, referencing its relations with the symbolic systems of the sacred and profane, it invites us to the display of the suffering of peripheral living, by exclusion. Of the pain of being disapproved of. This is how the body, that measureless and priceless space for each for sheltering our humanity, incarnates the narration of the figure of man, the surface that suffers the price of belonging to order and the civil code.
But Romo does not work the body's figure directly. He does not display his body or works over other's. He rests on the classic techniques and materials of printmaking – the photo scares by its relation with reality, unlike the strategy of drawing, which fascinates and bewitches-, allowing the blood and keeping away the abject from reality, for he aproximates the anomalous fiction in its closeness and distance from men's pathologies to be able to say what one wouldn't want to see. He even exposes the difficulty of describing something that is outlawed, the unnamable, what can't be thought, in other words, that which does not exist. Hence the circus' attractive, the circus' fright. The circus frightens when it shows what's real, like the bleeding wrestler, the broken saints, the burning curses, the wrinkles in the man's skin.
Romo, through the work of simulating photographic or cinematographic close-ups, the references to pages of scientific or medical study, to religious illustration, the obsession and saturation of linework as texture and delirium, the text that references apocryphal doctrines, profane dwellings. Displays and exhibits a body imperfect by current standards, without make-up or patronization, it its whole humanity, to give account of what the system's order calls "deficitary" or "monstruous".
In other words, Claudio shows through the body the taming of culture and its judiciousness. He displays the body as a place of punishment for nature in its possibilities, as a place of sacrifice but also of birth and subversion of language and its statement.
Barbara Lama.
From the catalog for Claudio Romo's exhibition "Images for an Apocryphal Anatomy", Pinacoteca of the University of Concepción, Chile. 2005.
+translated by stigmatattoo+